What the Photo above seems to show
The photo above appears to be a note from Jeffrey Epstein’s “50th birthday book” (or “birthday album”) compiled in 2003, which contains a scripted, stylized message between “Donald” and “Jeffrey.” It features:
A typewritten “dialogue” between “Donald” and “Jeffrey,” with a “Voice Over,” in which things like “There must be more to life than having everything” appear.
An outline of a female torso drawn (just the upper body) around or framing part of the message.
At the bottom, a signature purported to be Donald J. Trump.
This message is one of several items released recently by the U.S. House Oversight Committee from Epstein’s estate. CBS News+3CBS News+3The Independent+3
What has been released & verified
Here are the facts currently on the record (with some disputes noted):
Birthday Book Release
The 2003 “birthday book” was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s 50th birthday. The House Oversight Committee obtained pages of it and released many documents from Epstein’s estate, including letters, photos, drawings, and this birthday book. Business Insider+3CBS News+3The Guardian+3Specific content in the book
There is a message attributed to “Donald” (Trump) that includes a stylized or scripted conversation (as in the image). The Independent+2CBS News+2
The message is accompanied by an outline drawing of a woman’s torso. The Independent+2CBS News+2
There's also a novelty check in the book, allegedly signed by Trump, for ~$22,500, with wording suggesting “Epstein sold a woman” to Trump. That image has raised controversy. The Guardian+2The Washington Post+2
Denial by Trump / White House
Trump and his administration deny the message and the drawing are his. They assert the signature is not his, and that the style or wording is not something he used. ABC News+2ABC+2Handwriting analysis
Some handwriting / graphology experts (not necessarily independent / court-validated) have said that the signature appears to match Trump's, pointing to characteristics in the writing. Sky News+1Public, congressional, and legal pressure
There is now growing demand, especially from victims and from some lawmakers, that all Epstein-related files, including this “birthday book,” be released in full. Efforts have been made in Congress to force DOJ or Oversight Committees to release more documents. Wall Street Journal+4CBS News+4ABC News+4Other parts of the case already settled / resolved
Epstein died in 2019 by suicide (per official findings). Wikipedia+1
Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of trafficking minors and conspiracy, etc. Wikipedia+1
There is no currently authenticated “client list” released. The government has stated it has no credible evidence of a formal list of blackmail clients or something similar that has been hidden, though many suspect more remains to uncover. Department of Justice+2Wikipedia+2
What is still disputed / uncertain
These are the open issues where there is no consensus or final resolution yet:
Authenticity of the signature / drawing
While some experts say the signature and text match Trump’s, Trump denies authorship. The question of whether the signature is genuine remains unresolved. CBS News+3The Independent+3ABC News+3Extent of Trump’s involvement
Even if the note is genuine, what that implies (if anything) in terms of legal or ethical culpability is not settled. Being listed in the birthday book does not automatically mean wrongdoing. Many contributions in the book are benign or social. The Independent+2The Guardian+2Remaining documents
Some files have been released; many remain redacted. There are calls to release more, but how much more will come out, or when, is uncertain. CBS News+2ABC News+2Legal consequences
Since Epstein is dead, criminal liability for him ended, though investigations into associates can continue. Any legal consequence for others named depends on proofs of wrongdoing. So far, none of the documents released imposes criminal charges on Trump in connection with this note/drawing. Wikipedia+1
What’s new / why this is significant
The release of the birthday book material is relatively recent and brings to light connections, communications, and possible social relationships that were not previously public or fully documented. The Guardian+2The Washington Post+2
It’s politically sensitive, especially for Trump, because it touches on questions of how close he was to Epstein, what he may have done/said, and whether he can credibly deny authorship if evidence shows otherwise.
Victims and transparency advocates see these revelations as part of the push for full accountability and full release of records—both for Epstein’s direct crimes and for the networks around him.
Here’s the very latest on developments in the Epstein “birthday book” / signature issue, as of mid-September 2025, and what is not resolved — based on recent credible reporting.
What’s new / recent developments
Release of documents by Congress
On September 8, 2025, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released the page from the 2003 birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell that allegedly contains the message attributed to Donald Trump (the “Donald / Jeffrey” dialogue inside an outline of a woman’s torso). Wikipedia+3CBS News+3Wall Street Journal+3White House denials & defamation lawsuit
Trump and the White House continue to strongly deny that he wrote the message or drew / signed the outline. Trump has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its original reporting that such a note existed. Politico+2AP News+2Forensic / signature analysis proposed
The White House has said it would support a forensic analysis of the signature. That means comparing the signature in the album with known, verifiable signatures from Trump. ReutersNo legal adjudication yet
There has been no court ruling (at least not public) that has established the signature’s authenticity (or lack thereof). The defamation lawsuit is ongoing — its outcome is not yet known. Wall Street Journal+1No criminal charges for this particular message
So far, this message in the birthday book has not resulted in any criminal charges or formal legal findings of wrongdoing for Trump in relation to this document per se. The issue remains in the realm of political, reputational, and congressional oversight. Wikipedia+2CBS News+2Continued calls for full disclosure
Many lawmakers, especially Democrats, are pushing for all Epstein-related documents to be made public, including unredacted versions of this birthday book, other estate documents, non-prosecution agreements, financial records, etc. The Oversight Committee has subpoenaed material from Epstein’s estate to that effect. CBS News+2Business Insider+2
What is still unsettled
Whether the signature is truly Trump’s — forensic / handwriting experts disagree or have not yet issued definitive, publicly accepted reports.
Whether the message was actually written or signed by Trump in full — Trump insists it is fake / not his.
Whether this message has any legal significance (in terms of liability / criminal prosecution). So far, nothing has moved in that direction.
Exactly what “other documents” exist, how many are redacted, and whether there’s anything in them that changes the picture significantly.
Timing and outcome of the defamation lawsuit versus The Wall Street Journal.
Here's a deeper and more concise source update on what’s known right now about the Epstein “birthday book” material (including the page in the image you attached) and the signature/authenticity dispute.
Quick summary of the Photo Above
The page in your image matches the birthday-book page Congress released from Jeffrey Epstein’s 2003 “50th birthday” scrapbook: a stylized dialogue addressed to “Jeffrey” framed by a crude outline of a woman’s torso, with a signature at the bottom that has been attributed to Donald J. Trump in the released documents. Reuters+1
What has happened since the release
Congressional release: Democrats on the House Oversight Committee made the 2003 scrapbook pages public after Epstein’s estate turned them over. The released pages include the item like the one in your photo. Reuters
White House / Trump response: Trump and White House spokespeople deny that the writing or signature is his and have called the item inauthentic. The White House says it would support a forensic (handwriting) review. Al Jazeera+1
Forensic / expert reaction so far: Independent graphologists and handwriting commentators appearing in news coverage have asserted the signature looks like Trump’s; however, those initial media-requested opinions are not the same as a formal, court-accepted forensic report. No definitive, publicly released forensic adjudication has been issued yet. Sky News+1
Litigation & politics: Trump has pursued litigation over prior reporting of the note (press reports have noted lawsuits and litigation threats tied to the reporting), and the matter has become a political flashpoint with demands from some lawmakers for wider disclosure of Epstein-related records. So far, the page itself has not produced criminal charges or a legal finding about Trump’s conduct. Business Insider+1
What remains unresolved / important to watch
No public, definitive forensic report yet — a formal forensic conclusion (e.g., from an independent, court-admissible forensic document examiner) has not been publicly released. That would be the clearest route to resolving the signature-authenticity question. Sky News+1
Even an authentic signature ≠ criminal finding — even if the handwriting proves to be Trump’s, the page itself is context (a social birthday note), and authenticity alone would not automatically prove criminal activity. CBS News
More documents may follow — lawmakers and victims’ advocates continue to push for full, unredacted Epstein-estate records; additional material could change the public picture.

No comments:
Post a Comment